Wave mismatch occurs when the peaks of one turn do not align perfectly with the peaks of the adjacent turn. This is often caused by manufacturing inaccuracies in the pitch or by axial twisting during installation. When peaks are misaligned, the moment arm length changes, causing the spring rate to deviate from the design value. In bearing preload applications, this leads to non-uniform axial pressure on the bearing race. This non-uniformity causes localized heat generation, increased rolling resistance, and uneven wear on the balls/rollers, eventually leading to premature bearing fatigue (spalling) and system vibration.
Knowledge Center
Feilanalyse
Practical answers for wave spring and retaining ring selection, installation, materials and troubleshooting.
If the published answers do not match your application, send us your question and our team will review it.
The Goodman Diagram correlates the mean stress ($\sigma_m$) and alternating stress ($\sigma_a$) to the material's ultimate tensile strength ($S_u$) and endurance limit ($S_e$). For a wave spring, $\sigma_m = _x000c_rac{\sigma_{max} + \sigma_{min}}{2}$ and $\sigma_a = _x000c_rac{\sigma_{max} - \sigma_{min}}{2}$. The spring is considered safe for infinite life if $_x000c_rac{\sigma_a}{S_e} + _x000c_rac{\sigma_m}{S_u} < 1$. In high-frequency applications, such as fuel injectors, failure often occurs due to surface micro-cracks at the wave peaks. Shot peening is frequently employed to introduce compressive residual stresses on the surface, effectively shifting the operating point lower on the Goodman Diagram and extending the number of cycles before crack initiation.
Stress relaxation is the time-dependent loss of load under a constant deflection. In subsea valves, this is often driven by temperatures exceeding the material's thermal limit or high initial operating stress ($\%Min Tensile$). The primary indicator is a 'set' or reduction in free height ($H_f$). Quantitatively, the remaining load $P_t$ can be modeled using the Arrhenius relationship: $P_t = P_0 imes e^{-At imes e^{-Q/RT}}$, where $Q$ is activation energy. Failure analysis involves checking for micro-plastic deformation at the wave peaks. If $17-7PH$ fails, moving to Inconel X-750 or A286 is recommended, as these superalloys resist creep-deformation due to the $\gamma'$ (gamma prime) strengthening phase which remains stable at higher thermal energies.
A ring 'popping out' under nominal load is usually due to 'Incomplete Seating' or 'Radial Interference'. If debris is trapped in the groove, the ring cannot fully expand/contract into the bottom of the groove. Another cause is 'Chamfer Interference' on the mating part; if the mating part has a large chamfer or radius that contacts the ring, it creates a 'Radial Force Component' $P_r = P \cdot \tan(\theta)$ that pushes the ring out. Diagnosis involves checking the 'Contact Pattern' on the ring. If the wear marks are only on the outer edge, it indicates the ring was not fully seated. Corrective actions include cleaning the groove, reducing the mating part's chamfer, or ensuring the ring's free diameter provides enough 'Preload' in the groove.
Impact loading occurs when a thrust load is applied suddenly (e.g., a shock wave in a hydraulic cylinder). Unlike static loads, impact loads can exceed the material's dynamic yield strength. This often results in 'Shear-Out', where the portion of the shaft/bore material between the groove and the end is physically torn away. The failure surface appears rough and grainy. Troubleshooting requires a 'Dynamic Load' analysis. If the impact energy $E_k = 0.5 m v^2$ is high, the designer must increase the 'Edge Margin' $z$ or use a 'Square-Wire' ring which provides more surface area and reduces the peak stress. In extreme cases, a double-groove with two rings may be used to share the load.
Fatigue cracking in spiral rings often initiates at the 'End-Cut' or 'Notch' where the ring is split. In high-vibration environments (e.g., aerospace turbine housings), the ring can resonate, leading to high-cycle fatigue ($>10^7$ cycles). Diagnosis involves inspection under a microscope to find the 'Origin' of the crack, which usually shows a smooth 'Mirror' zone followed by 'Beach Marks'. If the vibration frequency matches the natural frequency of the ring $f_n$, the stress amplitudes are amplified. Mitigation includes changing the mass of the ring (using a different thickness) to shift $f_n$ away from the operating frequency, or applying a dampening grease.
Groove wall yielding occurs when the axial stress $σ_a$ applied by the retaining ring exceeds the yield strength $σ_y$ of the housing or shaft material. This stress is $σ_a = \frac{P}{\pi \cdot D \cdot d}$. As the wall yields, it creates a 'ramp' effect. Under cyclic loading, the ring 'walks' up this ramp until it clears the groove. This is 'catastrophic' because there is often no warning before the component is released. In aluminum housings (e.g., 6061-T6), this is a common failure. The fix is to use a steel 'Groove Insert' or to increase the groove depth $d$ to lower the stress, provided the shaft can handle the increased $K_t$.
'Dishing' is a failure mode where the retaining ring deforms into a conical shape under high thrust loads. This occurs when the groove wall yields or the ring's radial wall $b$ is too small to resist the moment created by the applied load $P$. Identification is simple: the ring appears 'warped' after removal. This deformation causes the ring to lose its grip on the groove bottom, eventually leading to it being 'ejected'. Troubleshooting involves checking the groove material hardness; if the groove is too soft, the ring will 'plow' into it. Solutions include using a 'Heavy Duty' series ring (thicker $t$) or hardening the groove wall to at least $30$ HRC.
Edge cracking is a manufacturing defect that occurs during the coiling or stamping of the flat wire, particularly in high-hardness materials like SAE 1090. If the edges of the wire have micro-burrs or 'slitting cracks' from the rolling process, these act as intense stress concentrators. During the forming of the waves, the outer edge of the wave is in tension. If the local stress exceeds the fracture toughness $K_{IC}$, a crack propagates. In service, these cracks grow via fatigue. To analyze this, a cross-sectional metallographic examination is performed. Prevention involves 'edge conditioning' or 'round-edge' processing of the wire before coiling to ensure a smooth, compressive stress state on the edges, which is standard for aerospace-grade springs.
A non-linear load-deflection curve in a theoretical linear wave spring (Crest-to-Crest) often points to 'Wave Nesting' or 'Radial Binding'. If the waves are not perfectly aligned, they may start to nest into one another as they flatten, changing the effective number of active turns $n$. Alternatively, if the spring is expanding and hitting the bore wall (Radial Binding), the friction against the wall adds an artificial load. Another possibility is 'End-Turn Interference', where the transition from the flat end-turn to the first wave is too abrupt. Troubleshooting requires a load-deflection test with a plot. A sudden increase in slope ($K$) suggests binding or solid height contact, while a decrease might suggest localized yielding. Precision grinding of the ends and ensuring proper bore clearance are the standard fixes.
Creep is the time-dependent deformation of a material under a constant stress lower than its yield strength, occurring at elevated temperatures. If a wave spring made of $302$ Stainless Steel is operating at $500^{∘}F$ ($260^{∘}C$), it is near its maximum operating limit. The atomic mobility increases, allowing dislocations to climb and glide, resulting in a loss of free height $H_f$ and consequently a loss of load $P$. Troubleshooting involves measuring the height loss over time. A material upgrade to $17-7PH$ CH900 or, for even higher stability, Inconel X-750 is recommended. Inconel X-750 maintains its elastic properties up to $1300^{∘}F$ due to its $\gamma'$ strengthened matrix, which effectively resists the creep mechanism at the $500^{∘}F$ threshold.
Fretting corrosion occurs in wave springs subjected to low-amplitude, high-frequency oscillations. It is characterized by the removal of the protective oxide layer on the spring's surface (e.g., the chromium oxide layer on $17-7PH$), leading to rapid oxidation and the formation of 'pits'. Diagnostic signs include the presence of a reddish-brown or black powder (debris) at the contact points between the spring and the bore or between turns in a nested spring. These pits act as stress risers, significantly reducing the fatigue life. In subsea environments, this can lead to 'fretting-induced SCC'. To troubleshoot, engineers should check for excessive vibration in the system and consider applying a sacrificial coating or a high-viscosity lubricant to dampen the micro-motion.
Torsional fatigue in wave springs usually occurs when the spring is not only compressed axially but also subjected to a twisting moment. This happens if the mating components rotate at different speeds or if there is significant vibration. The stress state becomes complex: $σ_{total} = σ_{axial} + τ_{torsional}$. Failure manifests as cracks initiating at the inner or outer edges of the waves, where stress concentrations are highest. Using SEM (Scanning Electron Microscopy), one would observe 'striations' characteristic of fatigue. To prevent this, the spring should be 'keyed' or the mating surfaces must have enough friction to prevent relative rotation. Using a material with a higher fatigue limit, like Inconel 718, and ensuring a smooth edge finish (deburring) are critical mitigations.
Galling is a form of wear caused by adhesion between sliding surfaces, common in stainless steels. During installation, if a spiral ring is expanded over a shaft without lubrication, the high localized pressure can cause the surfaces to weld and then tear. Forensic indicators include 'smeared' metal on the ID of the ring and matching 'torn' tracks on the shaft. This not only damages the shaft finish but can also 'work-harden' the ring locally, making it brittle and prone to cracking. Prevention involves the use of anti-seize compounds or choosing a ring with a specialized dry-film lubricant (like PTFE or MoS2) which provides a barrier between the two metal surfaces during the winding process.
Telescoping is a failure mode where the individual turns of a multi-turn spiral ring slide over one another axially, effectively 'unraveling' the ring. This happens when the axial force is so great that it overcomes the radial friction and the stiffness of the material, causing the ring to deform into a helix and slip out of the groove. It is often a sign that the ring's radial wall $b$ is too small for the applied load. Troubleshooting involves increasing the radial wall width or moving to a 'Heavy-Duty' series ring with a higher 'Moment of Inertia' ($I = _x000c_rac{b · t^3}{12}$) to resist the twisting motion that leads to telescoping.
The removal notch is a geometric discontinuity that acts as a stress concentrator (Stress Concentration Factor $K_t$). In dynamic applications where the ring is subjected to fluctuating axial loads or vibrations, the stress at the notch can exceed the material's endurance limit even if the nominal stress is low. The crack will typically initiate at the root of the notch and propagate radially through the wire. To troubleshoot, one should: 1) Increase the radius at the root of the notch; 2) Use a material with a higher fatigue strength (e.g., 17-7PH CH900); 3) Shot-peen the ring to introduce surface compressive stresses; or 4) Relocate the notch to a lower-stress region of the assembly.
'Walk-out' occurs when the retaining ring expands or contracts enough to lose its seat in the groove and is pushed out axially by the retained part. This is common in high-speed rotating applications where centrifugal force expands an external ring. It can also occur under high vibration (fretting) or if the ring is undersized for the groove. To prevent walk-out: 1) Use a 'Self-Locking' ring design; 2) Ensure the groove is deep enough (at least $1.5 · t$); 3) Verify that the ring has sufficient 'cling' by checking that its free diameter is significantly different from the groove diameter; 4) Minimize the radius on the retained part to prevent the 'wedge' effect.
Upon inspection of a failed assembly, groove wall yielding is identified by a 'dished' or 'peeled back' appearance of the groove itself, while the ring may remain intact but distorted. The metal of the groove will show signs of plastic flow. In contrast, 'Ring Shear' results in the ring being cut into two or more pieces, often with a 'shiny' shear plane on the cross-section of the wire, while the groove remains relatively sharp and square. Groove yielding is common when using hard rings in soft housings (e.g., steel rings in aluminum housings), whereas ring shear occurs when the thrust load exceeds the material's $\tau_{ult} · Area$ limit, often due to an unexpected shock load.
Hydrogen embrittlement is characterized by sudden, catastrophic failure under static load, often hours or days after installation. The fracture surface is typically intergranular (cracks follow grain boundaries) and lacks any signs of plastic deformation (necking). This occurs in high-carbon steels (SAE 1070-1090) that have been acid-cleaned or electroplated. If a wave spring snaps while simply sitting in a preloaded state in an assembly, hydrogen is the prime suspect. Detection involves scanning electron microscopy (SEM) to observe the intergranular facets. Prevention requires switching to a non-embrittling finish (like mechanical plating or dip-spin coatings) or strictly adhering to a post-plating bake protocol of $375^°F$ for 4-24 hours.
Fretting corrosion occurs at the contact points between the wave spring crests and the mating surfaces (e.g., housing or bearing race) when subjected to low-amplitude, high-frequency vibration. The oscillating motion breaks down the protective oxide layer of the metal, leading to rapid oxidation and the formation of abrasive debris (usually reddish-brown iron oxide in carbon steels). This debris further accelerates wear. In stainless steels, this can lead to pitting. To mitigate this, engineers should apply a high-pressure lubricant like a PTFE-based grease or use a surface coating like Electroless Nickel Plating (ENP). Increasing the preload can also help by 'locking' the spring in place and reducing the relative micro-motion.