Projektowanie i obliczenia

The edge margin, or 'groove location' $Y$, must be sufficient to prevent the shaft material from shearing off under load. The minimum distance $Y$ is typically calculated as $Y = \frac{K P}{D \pi S_y}$, where $P$ is the thrust load and $S_y$ is the yield strength of the shaft material. For most applications, a rule of thumb is $Y \ge 3G$ (three times the groove depth). If the edge margin is too small, the material between the groove and the end of the shaft will 'blow out' in a shear-tear failure mode, even if the ring itself is capable of carrying the load.

The K-factor is a safety coefficient used in the thrust load capacity formula $P_a = \frac{D \pi S_y t}{K}$ to account for the non-ideal distribution of stress. In spiral rings, the load is not always perfectly axial due to the 'gap' and the multi-turn geometry. A K-value of 3.0 is typically applied for calculated thrust loads to provide a margin against dynamic loading, shock, and variation in groove depth. For critical safety components, finite element analysis (FEA) is often used to refine the K-factor by simulating the actual contact pressure and the 'prying' effect that occurs at the ring tips.

A spiral retaining ring will begin to expand and lift out of its groove if the centrifugal force exceeds the ring's 'clinging' force. The maximum allowable RPM $N$ is calculated as $N = \sqrt{\frac{4.8 \times 10^{11} E t G^2}{w (D_o^3 R_m)}}$, where $E$ is the Modulus of Elasticity, $t$ is the thickness, $G$ is the groove depth, $w$ is the radial wall, $D_o$ is the outer diameter, and $R_m$ is the mean radius. If the application speed exceeds this value, a self-locking feature (a tab and slot) is required to mechanically prevent the ring from expanding radially. This is critical in high-speed automotive transmissions and aerospace turbine shafts.

The maximum load $P_{max}$ is reached when the peak stress $\sigma$ equals the yield strength $S_y$ of the material, adjusted for a safety factor. Rearranging the stress formula: $P_{max} = \frac{4 b t^2 N^2 S_y}{3 \pi D_m}$. For most spring steels, the design stress at work height is limited to $80\%$ of the minimum tensile strength to ensure long-term stability. If the calculated $P$ required by the system exceeds $P_{max}$, the designer must either increase the material thickness $t$, increase the radial width $b$, or select a material with a higher $S_y$, such as 17-7PH over 302 stainless.

The solid height $H_s$ of a Crest-to-Crest wave spring is the height at which the spring is fully compressed and the waves are flattened. It is calculated as $H_s = Z \times t$, where $Z$ is the number of turns and $t$ is the material thickness. However, in practice, a 'theoretical solid height' may be slightly higher due to the presence of the 'gap' or overlap in the turns. Design engineers must ensure the maximum work height $H_{min}$ is at least $20\%$ greater than $H_s$ to avoid 'bottoming out,' which causes an infinite spring rate and leads to catastrophic mechanical failure of the assembly.

The number of waves $N$ has a quartic relationship with the spring rate $k \propto N^4$. Increasing $N$ significantly increases the stiffness, allowing for higher load capacity within a very short axial space. However, as $N$ increases, the maximum allowable deflection $f_{max}$ decreases because the shorter arc length between peaks increases the bending stress for a given displacement. Engineers must balance $N$ to achieve the required $P$ at $H_w$ without exceeding the stress limit $\sigma < 0.8 S_y$. For high-deflection applications, a lower $N$ with a thicker material $t$ is often preferred.

While the Wahl factor is traditionally used for helical springs, a similar curvature correction is applied to wave springs to account for the non-linear stress distribution across the radial width $b$. The stress is higher at the inner radius $R_i$ than the outer radius $R_o$. The adjusted stress $\sigma_{adj} = C \cdot \sigma_{nom}$, where $C$ is a function of the ratio $D_m/b$. Ignoring this factor in compact designs where the radial width is large relative to the diameter can lead to unexpected yielding, as the peak fiber stress may exceed the yield strength $S_y$ by $15-20\%$.

The spring rate $k$ for a single-turn wave spring is primarily determined by the material properties and geometry. For a given load $P$ and deflection $f$, the relationship is expressed as $k = \frac{E b t^3 N^4}{R^3 D_m}$, where $E$ is the Modulus of Elasticity, $b$ is the radial width, $t$ is the material thickness, $N$ is the number of waves, and $D_m$ is the mean diameter. Note that for precision applications, the stress $\sigma$ must also be verified using $\sigma = \frac{3 \pi P D_m}{4 b t^2 N^2}$. In multi-turn Crest-to-Crest designs, the rate is divided by the number of active turns $Z$, assuming the waves are perfectly aligned to act in series.

For a spiral retaining ring, the moment of inertia $I$ of the cross-section is calculated as $I = \frac{b \cdot t^3}{12}$, where $b$ is the radial wall width and $t$ is the thickness. However, the radial stiffness of the ring—its ability to resist expansion or contraction—is also governed by the 'curved beam' theory. The stiffness is proportional to $E \cdot I / R^3$. This means that even a small increase in the radial wall $b$ significantly increases the force required to install the ring and its ability to remain in the groove. Designers must balance the radial wall width $b$ to ensure the ring is stiff enough to hold the load but flexible enough to be installed without exceeding the yield strength $\sigma_y$ during expansion.

The fundamental difference lies in the arrangement of the waves. In a Crest-to-Crest spring, the waves are in 'series', meaning the total deflection is the sum of the deflections of each turn. The rate is $k_{series} = \frac{k_{single}}{Z}$. In a Nested spring, the turns are in 'parallel', meaning each turn experiences the same deflection and the total force is the sum of the forces. The rate is $k_{parallel} = n \cdot k_{single}$. This means that for the same space envelope, a Nested spring will be many times stiffer than a Crest-to-Crest spring. Specifically, if a spring has 3 turns, the Nested version is 9 times stiffer than the Crest-to-Crest version ($3$ in parallel vs $1/3$ in series). This makes Nested springs suitable for extremely high loads with small deflections, while Crest-to-Crest is for large deflections with lower loads.

The radial expansion $\Delta r$ of a retaining ring due to rotation is given by $\Delta r = \frac{\rho \cdot \omega^2 \cdot R^3}{E}$, where $\rho$ is the density, $\omega$ is the angular velocity, and $R$ is the mean radius. The ring will fail when $\Delta r$ exceeds the groove depth $d$. More specifically, the maximum speed $N$ (in RPM) is calculated as $N = \sqrt{\frac{440 \times 10^6 \cdot E \cdot I}{w \cdot \rho \cdot R^4}}$, assuming the ring is made of steel. If the application requires a speed higher than this limit, a 'Self-Locking' ring or a heavier cross-section ring must be used. Additionally, the fit must be tight; a loose ring will start to expand at a lower RPM than a ring with high initial 'cling' (interference).

The number of waves $N$ has a dramatic effect on the spring's performance. The spring rate $k$ is proportional to $N^4$ ($k \propto \frac{E \cdot b \cdot t^3 \cdot N^4}{D_m^3}$). Adding waves significantly increases the stiffness. However, as $N$ increases, the allowable deflection $f$ decreases because the physical distance between wave crests becomes smaller, leading to steeper wave angles and higher bending stresses for the same amount of deflection. The stress $S$ is proportional to $1/N^2$. Therefore, a spring with more waves can carry a higher load $P$ but at the cost of reduced travel. Engineers must balance $N$ to achieve the required force $P$ within the available axial space without exceeding the material's yield strength.

The minimum groove depth $d$ is determined by the requirement that the groove material must support the axial load without yielding. The formula is $d = \frac{P \cdot K}{\pi \cdot D \cdot \sigma_y}$, where $P$ is the load, $K$ is the safety factor, $D$ is the diameter, and $\sigma_y$ is the yield strength of the housing material. Additionally, $d$ must be deep enough to ensure the ring's radial wall $w$ is substantially submerged. A common engineering rule of thumb is that $d$ should be at least $25\%$ to $50\%$ of the ring thickness $T$ to provide mechanical stability. If the groove is too shallow, the dishing moment will cause the ring to fail by 'slipping' over the groove edge rather than by shearing the ring material.

The solid height $H_s$ of a nested wave spring is calculated as $H_s = n \cdot t$, where $n$ is the number of turns and $t$ is the material thickness. However, this is a theoretical minimum. In reality, $H_s$ is influenced by the 'form error' of each wave. The effective solid height is usually $H_{s,eff} = n \cdot t + (n-1) \cdot \delta$, where $\delta$ is the deviation from perfectly flat coiling. When designing the housing, one must account for the maximum material condition (MMC) of the spring. If the gap between the spring and the housing floor is less than $H_{s,eff}$, the spring will 'bottom out' prematurely. This causes a sudden, infinite increase in the spring rate, often leading to catastrophic failure of the mating components or the spring itself due to extreme localized stress.

In high-speed rotating applications, centrifugal force acts on the mass of the retaining ring, tending to expand it radially and potentially lift it out of the groove. The limiting speed is $V = \sqrt{\frac{E \cdot I \cdot g}{w \cdot \rho \cdot R^4}}$, where $I$ is the moment of inertia, $w$ is the radial wall, and $\rho$ is the density. To combat this, 'Self-Locking' rings are designed with a tab and slot mechanism. The tab on the inner turn locks into a slot on the outer turn once the ring is seated in the groove. This mechanical interference prevents the ring from expanding due to centrifugal forces, allowing it to operate at RPMs far exceeding the theoretical limit of a standard spiral ring. This is essential for transmission components and high-speed electric motor rotors.

Shim ends, which are flat 360-degree circular ends added to a multi-turn spring, provide a more uniform distribution of the load across the contact surface compared to plain (wavy) ends. In a plain-end spring, the load is concentrated at the crests of the waves, which can lead to localized indentations in softer mating materials like aluminum. With shim ends, the load $P$ is spread over the entire $360^{\circ}$ circumference, reducing the contact stress $\sigma_c = \frac{P}{A}$. This is critical in high-precision assemblies where parallelism is required, as shim ends eliminate the 'point-loading' effect that can cause the assembly to tilt. However, shim ends increase the solid height $H_s$ by $2 \cdot t$, which must be accounted for in the space envelope calculation.

The thrust capacity of a spiral retaining ring assembly is limited by two distinct factors: the shear strength of the ring and the deformation of the groove. The shear capacity of the ring is calculated as $P_r = \frac{D \cdot T \cdot \pi \cdot S_s}{K}$, where $D$ is the shaft/bore diameter, $T$ is the ring thickness, $S_s$ is the shear strength, and $K$ is the safety factor (typically 3). However, the groove material is usually the weaker link. The groove yield capacity is given by $P_g = \frac{D \cdot d \cdot \pi \cdot \sigma_y}{K}$, where $d$ is the groove depth and $\sigma_y$ is the yield strength of the housing material. If the thrust load exceeds $P_g$, the groove wall will deform, causing the ring to dish (cone) and eventually 'walk out' of the groove. Engineers must use the lower of these two values as the design limit.

The spring rate $k$ for a Crest-to-Crest wave spring is derived from the beam deflection formula adapted for a circular geometry with $N$ waves and $Z$ turns. The standard formula is $k = \frac{E \cdot b \cdot t^3 \cdot N^4}{1.68 \cdot D_m^3 \cdot Z}$, where $E$ is the Young's modulus, $b$ is the radial wall, $t$ is the material thickness, and $D_m$ is the mean diameter. In high-precision applications, parasitic loads arise from the friction between the waves and the contact surfaces of the housing or shaft. As the spring compresses, the mean diameter $D_m$ slightly increases, which can lead to a non-linear stiffening effect near the end of the stroke. Designers must ensure that the operating height $H$ does not result in the spring reaching its solid height $H_s$, as the stress level $S = \frac{3 \cdot \pi \cdot P \cdot D_m}{4 \cdot b \cdot t^2 \cdot N^2}$ will spike exponentially, leading to plastic deformation or fatigue failure.

Groove yield occurs when the compressive stress on the groove wall exceeds the material's yield strength. The allowable thrust load is $P_a = _x000c_rac{D imes d imes S_y imes ext{Factor}}{ ext{Safety Margin}}$. The 'Factor' accounts for the fact that the stress is not perfectly uniform. If the housing material is changed from Aluminum 6061-T6 ($S_y \approx 35$ ksi) to Steel 4140 ($S_y \approx 95$ ksi), the thrust capacity of the same groove geometry increases by nearly 300%. Engineers must be cautious when 'upgrading' a system's load without checking the groove; even if the ring is strong enough (shear strength), the groove in a soft housing will be the point of failure.

A multi-turn spiral ring (usually 2 or 3 turns) is coiled from a thinner flat wire than a single-turn ring of the same load capacity. The total thickness $T_{total} = n imes t_{layer}$. The 'Multi-Turn' design allows for a smaller radial wall ($b$) because the load is distributed across multiple layers. This is critical in applications with 'Thin-Wall' housings where a deep groove for a thick single-turn ring would compromise the housing's structural integrity. Additionally, the multi-turn design provides a full 360-degree 'shoulder' without the gap found in standard circlips, ensuring uniform support for the retained part and eliminating 'point loading' on the groove.