In hydraulic cylinders, spiral rings often face dynamic axial loads that fluctuate with pressure cycles. The Safety Factor $SF$ is the ratio of the calculated Thrust Capacity $P_r$ to the Maximum Operating Load $P_{max}$. $SF = \frac{P_r}{P_{max}}$. For static loads, a $SF$ of $2$ is common. For dynamic or shock loads, the $SF$ should be increased to $3$ or $4$. The calculation must also account for the 'Groove Material Factor' $K_g = \frac{\sigma_{y,actual}}{\sigma_{y,ref}}$. If the housing is made of a lower-strength material (like 6061-T6 Aluminum), the effective thrust capacity of the assembly is significantly reduced. The formula becomes $P_{eff} = P_r \cdot \frac{\sigma_{y,housing}}{\sigma_{y,ring}}$, and the $SF$ must be applied to this lower $P_{eff}$ value.
Knowledge Center
ডিজাইন এবং গণনা
Practical answers for wave spring and retaining ring selection, installation, materials and troubleshooting.
If the published answers do not match your application, send us your question and our team will review it.
The natural frequency $
u$ of a wave spring is critical to avoid resonance. It is calculated as $
u_n = \frac{1}{2 \pi} \sqrt{\frac{k g}{W}}$, where $k$ is the spring rate and $W$ is the weight of the active portion of the spring. In high-speed valve-trains, if the valve's operating frequency or any of its harmonics match $
u_n$, the spring will undergo 'resonance surging'. This results in a drastic loss of load and high-amplitude oscillations that can cause the waves to clash and fail via rapid fatigue. To increase the natural frequency, a designer can increase the spring rate (by increasing $t$ or $b$) or decrease the mass. Wave springs are often preferred over coil springs in these applications because they can achieve the same rate with significantly less mass, resulting in a higher $
u_n$.
The 'cling' force is the radial pressure the ring exerts on the groove bottom, ensuring it doesn't rotate or vibrate. This is a function of the 'Free Diameter' ($D_f$) being smaller than the 'Groove Diameter' ($D_g$). The radial pressure $q$ is given by $q = \frac{E I (D_g - D_f)}{R^2 D_g D_f}$. Since $I = \frac{b t^3}{12}$, the cling force is directly proportional to the cube of the material thickness $t$. For applications with high vibration (e.g., automotive transmissions), a thicker ring or a larger 'under-size' on $D_f$ is required to increase the cling. However, this also increases the installation stress $\sigma = \frac{E t c}{2 R^2}$, where $c$ is the radial expansion required. Designers must solve these coupled equations to ensure the ring stays put without snapping during assembly.
In a gap-type wave spring, the mean diameter $D_m$ is the cubic denominator in the load formula $P = \frac{E b t^3 N f}{K D_m^3}$. This means that load is extremely sensitive to $D_m$. However, the bending stress $\sigma$ is proportional to $D_m / (b t^2)$. If $D_m$ increases while maintaining the same load $P$, the stress decreases significantly because the lever arm of the wave increases, but the thickness/width provides the resistance. In precision medical devices where space is constrained, engineers often have to minimize $D_m$, which drastically increases the stress for a given load. This often forces a transition from a gap-type to a multi-turn crest-to-crest design to distribute the total deflection across more waves and reduce the per-wave stress.
The thrust capacity of a spiral retaining ring assembly is fundamentally limited by the groove depth $d$. The formula for allowable thrust load based on groove deformation is $P_g = \frac{D d π σ_y}{S}$, where $D$ is the shaft/bore diameter, $d$ is the groove depth, and $\sigma_y$ is the yield strength of the groove material. Increasing $d$ increases capacity but also increases the stress on the ring during installation, as the ring must be expanded further to clear the shaft. Optimization involves finding the 'sweet spot' where $d$ is deep enough to provide a safety factor of $2$ against the applied axial load while ensuring the installation stress $\sigma_i = \frac{E t (D_{groove}-D_{free})}{D_{groove} D_{free}}$ does not cause the ring to set. For a 2-turn ring, the effective thickness $T$ is doubled, but the groove depth $d$ remains the primary constraint for the housing's integrity.
In a single-turn overlap wave spring, the number of waves $N$ significantly affects the spring constant $k$ and the stress distribution. According to the formula $k ∝ N^4$, small changes in $N$ lead to exponential changes in stiffness. For high-precision applications, a higher wave count (e.g., $N=5$ or $7$) produces a more stable and linear rate because it increases the number of contact points, thereby reducing the span between waves and minimizing the bending moment $M = \frac{P D_m}{4 N}$. However, as $N$ increases, the allowable deflection before the waves begin to interfere with each other (clashing) decreases. Designers must balance $N$ to achieve the required load while maintaining a safe operating stress below the elastic limit $\sigma_e = \frac{3 π P D_m}{4 b t^2 N^2}$.
Centrifugal lift-off occurs when the centrifugal force acting on the ring overcomes its internal cling-fit on the shaft. The limiting velocity $V$ is calculated using the formula $V = \sqrt{ \frac{4.48 \times 10^{12} E I g}{w \rho R^3} }$, where $E$ is the modulus, $I$ is the moment of inertia, $w$ is the weight of the ring per unit length, and $\rho$ is the material density. In high-speed turbomachinery, the ring expands radially, reducing the contact pressure on the groove. If the shaft speed exceeds this threshold, the ring can exit the groove entirely. To increase the RPM limit, engineers can specify a 'self-locking' feature where a tab on one turn interlocks with a slot on the adjacent turn, mechanically preventing radial expansion even under extreme centrifugal loads.
For a Crest-to-Crest wave spring, the load $P$ for a given deflection $f$ is derived from the modified Moyer's formula: $P = \frac{E b t^3 n f}{K D_m^3} \cdot \frac{I_D}{O_D}$, where $E$ is the Modulus of Elasticity, $b$ is the radial wall, $t$ is the material thickness, $n$ is the number of active waves per turn, and $D_m$ is the mean diameter. The correction factor $K$ accounts for the curvature of the waves and the transition between crests. In a shim-end configuration, the load-deflection curve becomes more linear compared to plain ends because the shim provides a uniform 360-degree contact surface, reducing the localized stress concentrations and preventing 'wave-nesting' during the initial compression phase. If $K$ is not accurately modeled based on the $D_m/b$ ratio, the calculated rate can deviate by up to 15 percent as the spring approaches its solid height.
The edge margin $Y$ is the distance from the groove to the end of the shaft or bore. It must be sufficient to prevent the material from shearing off under axial load. The formula is $Y = \frac{3P}{\pi \cdot D \cdot \sigma_y}$. If $Y$ is too small, the material behind the groove will experience shear failure or 'blowout'. In aerospace applications where weight is critical, $Y$ is optimized but generally kept to at least $3 \times$ the groove depth $d$ to maintain a safety factor of 2.0 or higher against the yield strength of the host material.
Dishing occurs when the thrust load causes the ring to bend into a conical shape. This is usually due to the groove's edge margin being too small or the groove wall deforming. As the ring dishes, it begins to 'walk' out of the groove. The relationship for the moment leading to dishing involves the load $P$ and the lever arm between the load application point and the groove support. If the groove radius is too large ($R > 0.1 \cdot T$), the ring will dish prematurely. The safety factor must be derated by a factor of $K \approx 1 - (R/T)$ to account for this geometric instability.
Centrifugal force acts to expand a spiral retaining ring, which can cause it to lift out of its groove at high RPMs. The limiting speed is calculated by $N = \sqrt{\frac{4.48 \cdot 10^{12} E t^2}{\gamma D_m^4}}$, where $t$ is the material thickness and $\gamma$ is the density. If the operating RPM exceeds this value, the ring's 'cling' on the groove is lost. To counter this, engineers specify 'self-locking' rings, which feature a small tab that mechanically locks the layers of the spiral together, preventing expansion. This is standard in aerospace turbine assemblies where rotational speeds can exceed 50,000 RPM.
The groove depth $d$ is critical because it determines the bearing area for the ring. The allowable thrust load based on groove deformation is $P_g = \frac{D \cdot d \cdot \pi \cdot \sigma_y}{S}$, where $\sigma_y$ is the yield strength of the housing/shaft material. Even if the ring is made of high-strength steel, if it is installed in a soft aluminum housing with a shallow groove, the housing will deform (dish) at much lower loads than the ring's shear capacity. Engineers must balance $d$ to maximize load while ensuring that the wall thickness of the shaft or bore is sufficient to prevent hoop stress failure.
The thrust capacity based on ring shear is calculated as $P_r = \frac{D \cdot T \cdot \pi \cdot S_s}{S}$, where $D$ is the shaft/bore diameter, $T$ is the ring thickness, $S_s$ is the shear strength of the material, and $S$ is the safety factor (typically 3). However, the overall system capacity is often limited by the groove material's yield strength rather than the ring's shear strength. The shear strength $S_s$ is approximately $0.6 \times$ the tensile strength of the spring material. For a 302 stainless steel ring with 160 ksi tensile strength, $S_s$ would be roughly 96 ksi. This calculation assumes the ring is properly seated and the groove has a square corner.
The stability of a Crest-to-Crest wave spring, particularly its resistance to buckling, is highly dependent on the wave count $N$. A higher $N$ provides more points of contact between turns, increasing lateral stability and ensuring a more uniform distribution of load. However, if $N$ is too high, the wave pitch becomes too small, making the spring overly stiff and increasing the risk of over-stressing the material. For most industrial applications, $N$ is an odd number (e.g., 3, 5, 7) to ensure proper crest-to-crest alignment and to avoid the harmonic resonance issues that can occur in high-frequency reciprocating environments.
The K-Factor is an empirical correction constant used in the Smalley or standard wave spring formulas to account for the geometry of the wave and the constraints of the material during manufacturing. While the theoretical rate is $k = \frac{E b t^3 N^4}{4 D_m^3 n}$, the inclusion of $K$ adjusts for the ratio of $D_i/D_o$ and the non-ideal curvature of the wave crests. For springs where the ratio of diameter to radial wall is small, the K-factor compensates for the increased stiffness due to tighter curvature, ensuring that the predicted load matches the actual test data within $\pm 10\%$ tolerance.
As a wave spring is compressed, the wave peaks flatten, causing the mean diameter $D_m$ to expand radially. The expansion can be estimated using the formula $\Delta D = 0.02 \cdot \frac{(L_f - L_w)}{N}$, where $L_f$ is the free height and $L_w$ is the work height. If the clearance between the spring's outer diameter and the bore is insufficient, the spring will bind, leading to erratic load-deflection behavior and potential galling. High-precision designs in automotive transmissions require calculating this expansion to ensure the spring remains free-floating throughout its operational stroke.
Operating stress $S$ is calculated using $S = \frac{3 \pi P D_m}{4 b t^2 N^2}$. This formula accounts for the load $P$ at the work height. Stress is most sensitive to the material thickness $t$ and the wave count $N$. Increasing $N$ significantly reduces the stress for a given load but increases the spring rate. For high-cycle applications, the maximum operating stress should not exceed $50-70\%$ of the minimum tensile strength of the material to ensure fatigue resistance. In 17-7PH CH900 stainless steel, the tensile strength typically reaches 200-240 ksi, allowing for higher operating stresses than standard 302 stainless.
How do you mathematically determine the spring rate (k) for a multi-turn Crest-to-Crest wave spring?
The spring rate $k$ for a multi-turn Crest-to-Crest wave spring is derived from the beam theory applied to curved segments. The standard formula is $k = \frac{E b t^3 N^4}{4 D_m^3 n}$, where $E$ is the Modulus of Elasticity, $b$ is the radial wall width, $t$ is the material thickness, $N$ is the number of waves per turn, $D_m$ is the mean diameter, and $n$ is the number of turns. In this configuration, the turns act as springs in series, which is why the rate is inversely proportional to $n$. Engineers must ensure the deflection does not exceed the linear range, typically defined as $80\%$ of the available travel to avoid wave nesting or 'bottoming out' which causes a non-linear spike in force.
The installation stress $S_i$ for a spiral ring is calculated as $S_i = _x000c_rac{E imes t imes ext{expansion}}{D^2}$. However, the radial wall $w$ (the width of the wire) also determines the force required to expand (external) or contract (internal) the ring. A wider radial wall $w$ increases the ring's moment of inertia $I = _x000c_rac{t w^3}{12}$, making it more difficult to install and increasing the risk of permanent deformation if the expansion exceeds the material's elastic limit. Engineers must optimize $w$ to ensure sufficient 'cling' on the shaft without making the ring so stiff that it cannot be installed over the shaft end.
Dishing is the elastic or plastic deformation where a retaining ring transforms from a flat washer shape into a conical shape under high axial loads. This is caused by a moment $M = P imes _x000c_rac{(L-t)}{2}$ where $P$ is the thrust load, $L$ is the lever arm (distance from the load point to the groove support), and $t$ is the ring thickness. If the dishing angle exceeds a few degrees, the ring may 'walk' out of the groove. To prevent this, the ring must be thick enough to provide sufficient section modulus, or the mating part must have a sharp corner to minimize the lever arm $L$.