Nested wave springs are produced by coiling multiple layers of the same wire in parallel, whereas Crest-to-Crest springs are coiled in series. The primary advantage of a nested spring is that the spring rate $K$ increases linearly with the number of turns $n$ (layers), expressed as $K_{total} = n \times K_{single}$. This allows for extremely high loads in very tight axial spaces where a single-turn spring would fail due to over-stressing. Mathematically, while a Crest-to-Crest spring increases deflection for a given load, a nested spring increases load for a given deflection. In subsea valve actuators, nested springs are used to provide thousands of Newtons of force with a stack height that is a fraction of what a traditional coil spring would require, though they are more susceptible to internal friction and galling between layers.
Knowledge Center
FAQ
Engineering Q&A for wave springs, retaining rings, selection, installation, materials and failure analysis.
If the published answers do not match your application, send us your question and our team will review it.
The number of waves $N$ is inversely proportional to the operating stress for a given deflection. The bending stress $\sigma$ is calculated by $\sigma = \frac{3 \pi P D}{4 N^2 b t^2}$, where $P$ is the load and $D$ is the mean diameter. Increasing $N$ reduces the stress at a specific load point because the total deflection is distributed across more contact points, effectively shortening the beam length between peaks. However, increasing $N$ also increases the spring rate $K$ exponentially ($N^4$), which can lead to a very stiff spring. For fatigue-critical applications, such as automotive clutch packs, $N$ is optimized to keep the alternating stress amplitude below the endurance limit of the material, typically $SAE 1070-1090$ carbon steel, while maintaining the required clamp force.
The spring rate $K$ for a multi-turn Crest-to-Crest wave spring is derived from the beam deflection formula adapted for a curved geometry. It is expressed as $K = \frac{E b t^3 N^4}{R^3 5.88 n}$, where $E$ is the modulus of elasticity, $b$ is the radial wall thickness, $t$ is the material thickness, $N$ is the number of waves per turn, $R$ is the mean radius, and $n$ is the number of turns. Non-linearity occurs primarily at the extremes of the deflection curve. At the start, 'bedding in' of the waves against the mating surfaces causes a lower initial rate. As the spring approaches 'solid height,' the waves begin to flatten and touch, causing a sharp increase in the rate. In high-precision applications, engineers must account for the $K_{factor}$ which adjusts for the change in the moment arm as the wave crests shift radially during compression.
Galvanic corrosion occurs when two dissimilar metals are in electrical contact in the presence of an electrolyte (like salt water). Stainless steel (302/316) is more noble than carbon steel. In this 'galvanic couple,' the carbon steel housing acts as the anode and corrodes preferentially, while the stainless ring acts as the cathode. The corrosion typically happens inside the groove, where the housing material is eaten away. This 'undercuts' the ring, eventually leading to a loss of the groove wall and the ring being ejected under load. In marine environments, this is prevented by using matching materials, applying protective coatings, or using sacrificial anodes. The 'Area Rule' also applies: a small anode (housing) and a large cathode (ring) is the worst-case scenario.
In pneumatic actuators, the piston often strikes the retaining ring with high kinetic energy $E_k = 0.5 \cdot m \cdot v^2$. Unlike static loads, impact loads create dynamic stress waves that can exceed the material's yield strength for a fraction of a millisecond. This can cause the spiral ring to 'dish' or even fracture due to the high strain rate sensitivity of some steels. To analyze this, the 'dynamic load factor' $L_d$ is used, where $P_{dynamic} = P_{static} \cdot L_d$. For sudden impacts, $L_d$ can be as high as 2.0. If failure occurs, the solution is to incorporate a 'buffer' or 'shock absorber' (like a polyurethane washer) between the piston and the ring, or to increase the ring's thickness $t$ to increase its stiffness and energy absorption capacity.
Edge margin is the distance $z$ from the groove to the end of the shaft. If $z$ is too small, the material between the groove and the shaft end can fail in 'double shear' or 'shear-out.' The failure looks like a small 'plug' of material being pushed off the end of the shaft. The required margin is typically $z \ge 3 \cdot d$ (where $d$ is groove depth). If a failure occurs even with $z > 3 \cdot d$, it may be due to 'moment-induced bending' of the shaft end. This is common in brittle materials like cast iron. Engineers should perform a finite element analysis (FEA) to ensure that the combined stress (axial shear + bending) at the corner of the groove does not exceed the material's shear strength.
Diagnosis of centrifugal dislodgement involves inspecting the ring and the groove for specific indicators. If the ring is found outside the groove and appears 'stretched' (its free diameter is now larger than its original manufactured diameter), but there are no shear marks on the groove edge, it likely expanded due to RPM. If the ring has 'burnished' or 'shiny' marks on its inner diameter, it indicates that it was spinning relative to the shaft before it dislodged. The forensic engineer would calculate the lift-off speed using $N = \sqrt{(K \cdot E \cdot I) / (w \cdot R^3)}$ and compare it to the motor's peak RPM. If the motor exceeded this speed, the design requires a self-locking spiral ring or a higher-interference fit.
Groove deformation occurs when the axial load $P$ exceeds the compressive yield strength of the groove material, even if the retaining ring itself remains intact. This is common when high-strength steel rings are used in soft aluminum or plastic housings. The ring 'sinks' into the groove wall, creating a 'ramped' surface. As the load increases, this ramped surface creates a radial outward force that eventually pushes the ring out of the groove. The failure is analyzed using the formula for bearing pressure: $\sigma_b = P / (\pi \cdot D \cdot d)$. If $\sigma_b$ exceeds the housing yield strength, failure is imminent. The fix is to increase the groove depth $d$, use a harder housing material, or use a wider radial wall $b$ on the ring to spread the load.
A snapping sound, often called 'oil canning' or 'buckling,' occurs when a wave spring turn flips or shifts suddenly during compression. This is usually due to a lack of radial guidance or an uneven wave height distribution. When the spring is compressed, the mean diameter expands; if the spring is constrained unevenly, the stress builds up until it is released by a sudden movement. This is detrimental to reliability because the sudden release of energy causes high-frequency stress waves (shocks) that can accelerate fatigue. Furthermore, it results in a non-linear load-deflection curve with significant hysteresis. The solution involves improving the concentricity of the housing and ensuring the spring's waves are uniform within $\pm 2$ degrees of phase.
How does 'Fretting Corrosion' occur in wave springs and how can it be mitigated in subsea couplings?
Fretting corrosion occurs at the contact points between the wave spring and the mating surfaces (or between turns of a multi-turn spring) when subjected to low-amplitude, high-frequency vibration. The small relative motion removes the protective oxide layer (e.g., the Cr2O3 layer on stainless steel), leading to rapid oxidation and the formation of abrasive debris (red rust on carbon steel, black powder on stainless). This debris accelerates wear and can lead to premature failure. In subsea couplings, this is mitigated by using Inconel X-750 and applying a solid-film lubricant like Molybdenum Disulfide (MoS2) or a silver plating. The lubricant reduces the coefficient of friction and prevents the metal-to-metal contact that drives fretting.
Fatigue failure typically manifests as a clean, brittle-appearing fracture originating from a wave crest or trough, where the bending stress is maximum. Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) will reveal 'striations'—microscopic ridges each representing one load cycle. In the case of a Crest-to-Crest spring, the crack usually starts at the inner diameter (ID) of the crest because that is where the highest tensile stress occurs during compression. If the fracture surface shows 'beach marks' (macroscopic ridges), it indicates periods of varying load intensity. To prevent recurrence, the stress range $Δ\sigma$ must be reduced, or the surface finish must be improved (e.g., by vibratory finishing) to remove micro-scratches that act as stress risers.
Load loss in the absence of cracks usually points to stress relaxation or 'creep.' In a recent aerospace valve failure, 17-7PH springs lost 15 percent of their preload after 500 hours at 300 C. Detailed metallurgical analysis showed that while 300 C is within the 'rated' range, the combination of high mean stress (70 percent of yield) and temperature accelerated the dislocation movement within the martensitic laths. The solution was to switch to Inconel X-750, which has a higher creep resistance. Another possibility is 'wear' at the contact points (crests); if the crests wear down by just 0.05 mm in a spring with a low spring rate, the load drop can be substantial due to the $P = k \cdot Δx$ relationship.
Permanent set is identified when the free height $H_0$ of the spring after loading is significantly less than the original $H_0$ as manufactured. This is a result of the material being stressed beyond its proportional limit. The most common cause is 'over-compression'—taking the spring too close to its solid height. The stress at solid height $\sigma_s$ should never exceed the yield strength $\sigma_y$. If a design requires the spring to be compressed near solid, a 'preset' operation (compressing the spring to solid during manufacturing) can be performed to 'remove' the initial set and induce beneficial residual stresses. Another cause is 'thermal relaxation' where the operating temperature exceeds the material's limits, causing the microstructure to rearrange and lose its elastic energy.
In applications subject to heavy vibration or impact (e.g., jackhammers or racing engines), the orientation of the spiral ring's end gap relative to the primary vibration axis is critical. If the vibration is perpendicular to the gap, the inertia of the ring ends can cause them to 'chatter' against the groove, leading to fretting wear and eventually widening the groove. The preferred orientation is to have the gap aligned with the direction of the highest acceleration. For spiral rings, the 'gap' is actually the space between the ends of the coiled wire. Because spiral rings have 360-degree contact (unlike circlips which have a large gap), they are inherently more resistant to vibration, but ensuring the ends are tucked into the groove is still paramount to prevent dislodgement.
Installing a multi-turn spiral ring in a deep bore (e.g., a hydraulic cylinder) requires the ring to be compressed to a diameter smaller than the bore. Because the ring consists of two or more turns of flat wire, it behaves like a very stiff spring. Using a 'tapered plug' is the most effective method: the ring is compressed as it is pushed through the plug into the bore. The main challenge is 'scuffing' of the bore's polished surface, which can lead to seal failure. To prevent this, rings are often lubricated with assembly oil or coated with a dry-film lubricant (PTFE). Additionally, the installer must ensure the ring 'snaps' fully into the groove, often verified by an audible click or a visual check with an inspection mirror.
Radial clearance is the gap between the ring's inner diameter (for internal rings) or outer diameter (for external rings) and the bottom of the groove. For external rings, if there is excessive clearance, the ring has more room to expand under centrifugal force before it is constrained. This lowers the effective 'lift-off' RPM. To maximize centrifugal capacity, the ring should be designed with an 'interference fit' on the groove bottom. The formula for the force required to expand the ring is $F = (4 \cdot \pi \cdot E \cdot I \cdot Δr) / R^3$. By ensuring $Δr$ is negative (interference), a significant portion of the centrifugal force is consumed just to bring the ring to a neutral state, thereby extending the safe operating speed.
For a spiral retaining ring to function at its rated thrust capacity, the groove depth $d$ must be precisely controlled. Typically, the groove depth is set such that 70-80 percent of the ring's radial wall $b$ is submerged. A common specification is $d = (b - clearance)$. If a chamfer is present on the retained part (the component the ring is holding), it must be kept to a minimum. The maximum allowable chamfer $c_{max}$ is calculated as $c_{max} = 0.5 \cdot (b - d)$. If the chamfer is too large, it creates a 'wedge' effect that exerts a radial outward force on the ring, potentially popping it out of the groove under axial load. In such cases, a square-edged backup washer must be used between the chamfered part and the ring.
Compare the 'Plunger and Tapered Sleeve' installation method with manual 'Winding' for spiral rings.
The 'Plunger and Tapered Sleeve' method is used for high-volume automated assembly. A sleeve with a gradual internal taper is placed over the shaft, and a plunger pushes the spiral ring through the sleeve, expanding it uniformly until it snaps into the groove. This ensures even stress distribution and prevents permanent deformation. Manual 'winding' involves starting one end of the ring in the groove and walking the rest of the ring around the circumference. While winding requires no special tooling, it carries a higher risk of 'over-spreading' the ring or scratching the shaft surface. For rings with a radial wall $b > 6$ mm, manual installation becomes physically difficult, and the risk of the ring 'springing back' and causing injury or damage increases.
When a wave spring is used in a housing made of a relatively soft material like aluminum (e.g., 6061-T6), the concentrated loads at the wave crests can cause 'brinelling' or localized indentation. This increases the effective work height and reduces the spring preload over time. To prevent this, a hardened steel load washer (typically RC 40-45) is placed between the spring and the aluminum surface. The washer distributes the load over a larger area. The thickness of the washer must be accounted for in the total stack-up height calculation: $H_{total} = H_{spring} + t_{washer}$. In high-vibration automotive environments, this is a standard practice to prevent wear-induced loss of tension in belt tensioners or clutch packs.
What is the 'Nesting' phenomenon in multi-turn wave springs and how is it prevented during assembly?
Nesting occurs when the waves of adjacent turns in a Crest-to-Crest spring align and 'stack' inside each other instead of making crest-to-crest contact. This causes the spring to behave like a single-turn spring with a much higher spring rate and much lower travel. Nesting is prevented by 'keying' the spring or, more commonly, by ensuring the spring is manufactured with a slight 'shimming' turn or by using a 'Linear-Flat' end. During assembly, the technician must visually inspect the spring to ensure the turns are properly staggered. For automated assembly, specialized bowls and tracks must be designed to orient the springs without tangling, as the open-coil nature of wave springs makes them prone to interlocking.